(via Desktop Project Part 9: Again I see IC 342 | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine)
Spitzer may be “down” a bit (no coolant means it will not capture images as well), but it’s certainly not out.
IC 342 is bright and fairly close, but behind a lot of our own galaxy’s dust from our point of view, so it’s easier to see in infrared.
Above (and click through for the amazing full-size) is Spitzer’s IR take on IC 342.
Spitzer has a mirror twice the size of WISE’s, so it gets more detail than in this one:

(Credit: WISE)
Still, it’s always good to keep looking.
For comparison, if you have a serious amount of patience (as Phil’s friend in Anchorage did) and a good, dark night, you can capture a visible shot of IC 342:

(Credit: Travis Rector)

(via Desktop Project Part 9: Again I see IC 342 | Bad Astronomy | Discover Magazine)

Spitzer may be “down” a bit (no coolant means it will not capture images as well), but it’s certainly not out.

IC 342 is bright and fairly close, but behind a lot of our own galaxy’s dust from our point of view, so it’s easier to see in infrared.

Above (and click through for the amazing full-size) is Spitzer’s IR take on IC 342.

Spitzer has a mirror twice the size of WISE’s, so it gets more detail than in this one:

(Credit: WISE)

Still, it’s always good to keep looking.

For comparison, if you have a serious amount of patience (as Phil’s friend in Anchorage did) and a good, dark night, you can capture a visible shot of IC 342:

(Credit: Travis Rector)

  1. tinystarkitten reblogged this from angwe
  2. angwe posted this
Short URL for this post: http://tmblr.co/ZvR1jxJQfQwR
blog comments powered by Disqus